ASPO Abstracts
Empowering Latinas to Obtain Breast Cancer Screenings: Comparing Intervention Effects, Part 2
Category: Cancer Health Disparities, Behavioral Science & Health Communication
Conference Year: 2018
Abstract Body:
Purpose: We compare the effects of breast cancer education and empowerment approaches on non-adherent Latinas’ breast health behaviors and dissemination of health information. Methods: The setting for this ongoing, quasi-experimental trial is two Latino, lower income communities in Chicago. Women were recruited via two community-based organizations and snowball sampling. Eligibility criteria were: 1) age of 52-74; 2) lack of screening within past 2 years; 3) no previous breast cancer diagnosis; and, 4) no health volunteerism experience. Women were assigned to a three week group intervention (3 2 hour sessions). The education intervention is administered in East Side/South Chicago and the empowerment intervention is administered in Pilsen/Little Village to avoid contamination effects. The education intervention has 3 sessions focused on early detection and prevention (diet, physical activity). The empowerment intervention has 3 sessions focused on early detection, sharing information with family/friends, and health volunteerism. Navigation is provided if women wish to obtain mammograms. Three questionnaires are given at baseline, post-intervention, and a 6 month follow-up. Results: Among our 68 participants (34 education; 34 empowerment), 87% were born in Mexico; 59% had <9th grade education; 52% had a median household income of <$10K; and, 51% were uninsured. The average age was 61.21 (SD= 6.20). Relative to education participants, more empowerment participants have scheduled mammograms (94% vs. 74%; p=.05) and obtained mammograms (77% vs 38%, p = .001). Empowerment participant also spoke to more individuals about breast health relative to education participants (M=6.24, SD = 5.30 vs M=3.00, SD = 3.04, p = .003). A greater proportion of engagement participants also spoke about specific types of breast cancer screening (58% vs 38%, p = .01) and discussed breast cancer across multiple settings (58% vs 24%, p = .003). Discussion: The empowerment approach may be particularly effective in changing non-adherent Latinas’ screening behaviors and promoting them to become agents of change in their communities. Limitations concern generalizability due a non-probability based sample, and limited ability for causal inferences due to a lack of randomization.
Keywords: breast cancer; Latinas; health dissemination; comparative effectiveness