METABOLIC HEALTH PHENOTYPE AND RISK OF CANCER IN THE UTAH OBESITY COHORT STUDY

Authors: Karra P, Poss AM, Haaland B, Thompson HJ, Kim J, Adams T, Hunt SC, Smith KR, Summers SA, Coletta AM, Hardikar S, Playdon MC

Category: Early Detection & Risk Prediction
Conference Year: 2021

Abstract Body:
Purpose: Body mass index (BMI) may misclassify obesity-related cancer risk since metabolic dysfunction can exist at any BMI. Whether weight loss improves metabolic health may also be heterogeneous. We measured the association of metabolic dysfunction, independent of obesity, and metabolic response to surgical weight loss, with risk of cancer. Methods: In the Utah Obesity Study, a large prospective cohort of gastric bypass (N= 418) and non- surgical patients with severe obesity (N=737), clinicodemographics and metabolic health parameters were measured at baseline, 2-years (post-weight loss in the surgery group), 6 and 12-years. We classified participants into metabolic health phenotype (metabolic syndrome (MetS) ( >=3 Adult Treatment Panel III criteria) per obesity class (obese I/II (BMI >=30 & <40 kg/m2), III/IV (BMI >= 40 & <50 kg/m2), or V+ (BMI >= 50 kg/m2)), and measured changes in metabolic syndrome criteria from baseline to 2-years on a continuous scale in the bariatric surgery group (>=10% improvement, yes/no). We determined their associations with cancer incidence using logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, % weight change from baseline, and study group. Results: Participants were predominantly female, white, middle-aged (45+/-9 years), and morbidly obese (BMI 45.9+/-5 kg/m2; % fat 52+/-3%). All groups with MetS had elevated risk of cancer compared with normal/overweight individuals without MetS. Although results were non-statistically significant, within obesity classes, those with MetS versus without MetS had higher cancer risk (e.g., obese I/II without MetS OR=1.15 (0.24, 5.5); obese I/II with MetS 1.61 (0.24, 10). Those who did not improve MetS criteria after surgical weight loss by >=10% had higher risk of cancer compared with those who did see improvements (OR=1.28, 95% CI 0.18, 5.85 at 6-years; OR=1.59, 95% CI 0.21, 8.27 at 12-years). Wide confidence intervals suggest follow-up in a larger cohort. Conclusions: Metabolic dysfunction, independent of obesity, and metabolic non-response to surgical weight loss were not associated with cancer risk. A follow-up study in a larger cohort is ongoing.

Keywords: Metabolic phenotypes, weight-loss non- responders, cancer