Identifying small geographic areas for educational radon interventions

Authors: Ou Judy Y PhD MPH, Ramsay Joemy M PhD, Hanson Heidi A PhD, Akerley Wallace MD, Divver Eleanor MSPH, Kirchhoff Anne C PhD MPH, Kepka Deanna PhD

Category: Cancer Health Disparities
Conference Year: 2021

Abstract Body:
Purpose: Educational interventions are currently the only approved means to improve radon testing in Utah, a state with a low smoking and high radon emission potential. This ecologic analysis describes characteristics of census block groups that are priorities for targeted educational interventions about radon testing. Methods: A database of 20,368 household radon tests collected from 2001 to 2017 by a public health agency were linked to radon soil emission potential maps and demographic data from the 2010 census. We identified priority intervention census block groups, defined as block groups with ≤5% of homes tested and ≥75% of homes on high radon potential soils. We fit log-linear Poisson models to calculate associations between block-group level demographic characteristics and the rate ratios (RR) for the proportion of homes on high radon soils and home radon testing. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) using logistic regression models to identify demographic characteristics of priority intervention block groups, defined as having ≤5% of homes tested for radon and ≥75% of homes on high radon soil. Results: In our data, 40% had radon greater than the health standard of 4 pCi. Within block groups, the proportion of homes built on high radon soils was positively correlated with a greater percent of of Asian residents (RRper10%=1.34, 95% CI=1.31-1.37) and owner-occupied housing units (RRper10% =1.15, 95% CI=1.15-1.15). The proportion of homes tested for radon was inversely correlated with the percent of Hispanic (RRper10%=0.71, 95% CI=0.69-0.74) and Native American residents (RRper10%=0.18, 95% CI=0.14-0.24). Characteristics correlated with designation as a priority intervention block group were a greater percent of persons aged <25 years (OR per10%=1.35, 95% CI=1.06-1.70), single female heads of household (OR per10%=1.93, 95% CI=1.04- 3.57), and owner occupied housing units (OR per10%=1.24, 95% CI=1.12-1.36). Conclusions: Culturally and linguistically appropriate resources for radon testing among block groups with a great percent of Hispanics, Native Americans, female heads of households, and persons aged <25 years. Providing radon test kits and additional support to these populations and home owners may also be needed.

Keywords: Lung Cancer; Radon; Education