Racial and place-based differences in smoking population attributable risk for lung cancer

Authors: Aldrich MC, Munro HM, Mumma M, Sanderson M, Blot WJ

Category: Cancer Health Disparities
Conference Year: 2020

Abstract Body:
Purpose: To estimate attributable risks for smoking in lung cancer among blacks and whites in a large prospective cohort. Methods: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Racial differences in both lung cancer incidence and smoking patterns exist, but few studies have examined racial differences in the smoking attributable risk for lung cancer. We conducted a prospective study among 41,038 African American and 18,062 white low-income adults age 40-79 at baseline in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS) followed for up to 15 years. We estimated the population attributable risk (PAR) percent of lung cancer associated with smoking reported at baseline (classified as ever/never; current or former versus never; <10, 10-19, 20+ pack-years versus never) using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with robust standard errors by race, race-sex, and geographic urban/rural residence groups. Results: Overall, 83% of lung cancer cases (N=1,039 of 1,251 incident lung cancers) among SCCS participants were attributable to smoking, but the PAR varied by race (PARs of 80% in blacks versus 88% in whites). The higher overall PAR in whites was mainly due to their higher prevalence of 20+ pack-year smokers, with PARs among such heavy smokers of 76% in whites versus 46% in blacks. Lighter smokers (< 10 pack-years) accounted for 3% of cases among whites but 10% among blacks, with moderate smoking (10-19 pack-years) accounting for 9% of cases among whites and 24% among blacks. Despite lower prevalence of smokers among women than men, little differences in smoking PARs were observed between males and females (PARs of 78%, 78%, 88% and 87% respectively among black males, black females, white males and white females), but PARs tended to be higher among urban (PAR 85%) than rural (PAR 76%) residents. Higher PARs for urban residents were maintained across all race-sex groups except for white females. Conclusions: Racially-specific and place-based population attributable risks were observed. These PARs provide a tool for prioritizing intervention targets to address inequities in lung cancer.

Keywords: disparities, smoking, lung cancer, population attributable risk