ASPO Abstracts
Collecting non-clinical data to address disparities in cancer prevention: Lessons from the field
Category: Behavioral Science & Health Communication
Conference Year: 2020
Abstract Body:
Background and Purpose: Research on risk-reduction decision making among women at high risk of breast
cancer rarely addresses minority groups, despite indications they may face additional burdens at every stage.
Because most high-risk women are not in high-risk clinical care, effective prevention research requires
recruitment beyond clinical populations.
Methods: The Daughter, Sister, Mother Project has collected qualitative and quantitative data from high-risk
African American and White women not in clinical care. Non-clinical recruitment sites include social media,
volunteer databases, and community organizations.
Results: These recruitment methods present unique challenges for which we have developed specific
solutions. (1) Risk prediction modeling. Because the individual risk level of women recruited through non-
clinical methods is usually unknown, risk prediction modeling must be built into data collection. Telephone
screening allows risk prediction modeling before enrollment but requires multiple contact points. Collecting risk-
related information within an interview or survey makes data collection possible within a single interaction, but
requires risk-prediction modeling and sample trimming afterward. (2) Bots and fraudulent participants.
Combining online data collection with social media recruitment facilitates involvement of participants not
commonly drawn into biomedical research, but also exposes studies to various forms of fraud. To avoid
wasting incentive funds and incorporating fraudulent information into datasets, we have developed methods to
distinguish “real” from “fake” participants. These include programming methods, semi-automated and manual
data-checking methods, and direct phone contact after data collection. (3) Ongoing connections. African
American women not involved in high-risk clinical care may be highly-motivated but hesitant to participate in
prevention research. Trust can be built through connections with community organizations, ongoing two-way
contact with our research team, and returning findings to the communities where we collect data.
Conclusions: Recruiting from non-clinical populations is a useful tool for cancer prevention research, and
requires creative recruitment, data collection, and data cleaning methods.
Keywords: High-risk breast cancer Cancer health disparities Breast cancer prevention