An assessment of poverty and cancer survival in a state registry

Authors: Markt SC, Feng H, Koroukian S, Curtis J, Rose J, Schumacher FR

Category: Cancer Health Disparities
Conference Year: 2020

Abstract Body:
Purpose of the study: The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the association between poverty as a measure of socioeconomic status and cancer survival in the Ohio cancer registry, Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS). Methods: OCISS collects information on all cancer diagnoses in the state of Ohio beginning in 1996. From this registry, we obtained demographic, clinical and outcome data on over a million malignant cancer cases diagnosed from 1996-2016. Census tract level poverty was defined as the percentage of individuals living below the poverty line based on the 2000 US census data, and coded: <5%, 5-<10%, 10-<20%, and ≥20%. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between poverty and overall survival, adjusting for cancer site, age, race, sex, stage, and primary treatment. We also evaluated the association with cause-specific mortality for prostate (among men only) and bladder cancers. Results: There were 717,945 (58%) deaths among the 1,232,154 cancer cases in OCISS. For all sites and sexes combined, the association with overall survival between the highest and lowest poverty categories was 1.25 (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.24-1.26). Among men with prostate cancer (n=157,497), increasing poverty index was associated with overall and prostate-cancer specific survival (overall HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.33-1.41; prostate-cancer specific mortality HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.34-1.54). Among 32,531 cases of bladder cancer, we found similar associations; the highest poverty category was associated with a 35% increased risk of overall mortality (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.29-1.41) and a 32% increased risk of bladder-cancer specific mortality (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.24- 1.41), compared with the lowest poverty category. Conclusions: In Ohio, living in census tracts with higher levels of poverty was associated with both overall and cancer-specific survival. Future analyses will incorporate more discrete categorizations of socioeconomic status, including the area deprivation index and geospatial characteristics, and will assess sex- and race-specific survival across these poverty and deprivation categories.

Keywords: State registry poverty cancer survival